![]() ![]() We need diversity of things far deeper - to embrace and celebrate true 'feminine thinking' - not just what's on the surface. We're still picking what's taking place on the inside. Modern diversity policies that change what's on the outside (how many penises are around the table) don't actually solve the real problems. I'm slowly trying to understand it more, as my own starting point. Personally, I think such leadership needs more female thinking. ![]() Most females at top levels in business at this time in our culture would appear to mostly have this success because they are 'atypically' strong in 'masculine thinking'. I now see that 'male thinking' (as opposed to males), such as 'specialisation', dominates modern capitalism and public policy, and often to detriment. It solves problems by looking at the whole picture at once. It's about specialisation.įemale thinking treats things more as a whole, with everything connected. Male thinking solves problems by breaking things down and focusing on one part of the picture at a time. I find it very hard to multi-task, and I easily hyperfocus. (Dualism.) I'm a guy and I consider myself having a 'super' 'male' brain in some aspects even more than the average. 'Masculine thinking' prefers to categorise and bifurcate. (Chapter entitled, "The Law of Gender Rigidity") See Robert Green's book "The Laws of Human Nature" (2018) for his take on the following. Natural variations exist in all things, but if you look at what's most common, with biological sex differences (whch feed cultural 'stereotypes'), they still are what they are. It appears to be drawn biologically from the genetic male sex and 'male brain' vs. ![]() It also may be because of what I observe as 'masculine thinking' vs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |